| The
Fourth Partner Meeting - London
The main issue at this meeting was the partner countries'
presentations of the pilot runs that had, or hopefully had, taken
place during the last few months.
This was a very enlightening experience with regards
to the common understanding of the projects aims and needs, as
a research project.
Due to various problems and misunderstandings not
all trial runs had been carried out as prescribed.
Sweden
had for a long time been locked in an industrial conflict, leaving
them little time to spend finding suitable companies for the trial
run. They had now engaged Per Svensson, from SEF (the Swedish
trade union) as an additional partner to take charge of the practical
work involved on the Swedish side of the project.
Denmark's trade union had developed their own mapping
tool, and preferred that their companies should use it, which
presented a new challenge for our Danish partner in finding a
suitable pilot companies.
UK found it diffucult to "sell in" the
project without being able to demonstrate the webtool properly.High
speed internet connections are not yet standard in all offices
in the target group. UK, in common with the other partners, wished
for a demo version of the webtool on cd. This possibility was
duly noted by the project manager and would be checked out in
the near future.
Greece had managed to find two companies to use
as pilots, but their needs turned out to be a bit outside of the
scope of the project. This meant that the results would not be
comparable with the other countries. This would mean that one
of the project's aims, to be able to compare qualifications internationally,
would not be reached. Adjustments would have to be made or new
companies found.
One of Norway's companies had completed the process
all the way through to evaluation. The other had still to evaluate,
but had otherwise completed the process.
The evaluation we did of the trial run processes
showed, uring the first day of the partner meeting, that we were
clearly behind schedule and maybe were still a bit unclear as
how best to tackle the immense task of runnin pilots. It became
obvious that we would have to postpone the next partner meeting
in June, and set up a new date in August. This would give those
partners who needed it time to find companies, and others time
to redo some of the tasks in accordance with set conditions as
similar as possible to each other so that the end results may
be comparable. This of course now meant using up our time buffer,
so that everything would have to go as planned from now until
the next meeting.
At this stage in the project, we have a complete
process to offer companies wishing to partake in the project as
pilots, including a web based competence mapping tool that has
had most of the flaws ironed out in 5 European languages. After
the pilot runs, we should also have enough information to say
if the tool and process as a whole, are suitable for use in the
five partner countries, and what adjustments would be needed to
to make it internationally viable.
|